<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Learning Aesthetics &#187; Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sightwork.org/la/category/tools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sightwork.org/la</link>
	<description>Everything we know isn&#039;t wrong; we just don&#039;t know enough to sort it out...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:43:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Reality Makes Us Stupid</title>
		<link>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2010/04/reality-makes-us-stupid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2010/04/reality-makes-us-stupid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 18:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmlittle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sightwork.org/la/?p=427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[or at least makes it clear in its own way that we&#8217;re not as smart as we need to be Here&#8217;s a link to the NYT article that comments on the above image, we won&#8217;t say explains it. What occurs to me in that what it really demonstrates is that things are way complicated. Arguably [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or at least makes it clear in its own way that we&#8217;re not as smart as we need to be<br />
<a href="http://www.sightwork.org/la/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/091203-engel-big-9a.jpg" rel="lightbox[427]"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-428" title="091203-engel-big-9a" src="http://www.sightwork.org/la/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/091203-engel-big-9a-300x219.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="219" /></a><br />
Here&#8217;s a link to the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/27/world/27powerpoint.html">NYT article</a> that comments on the above image, we won&#8217;t say explains it.  What occurs to me in that what it really demonstrates is that things are way complicated.  Arguably we have to something despite that complexity, and tools, particularly IT tools (assuming you count PowerPoint as IT) can help. The danger is that they can give you the illusion of understanding and control; if you can graph it or chart it you don&#8217;t have to think about it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2010/04/reality-makes-us-stupid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Tis a Gift to be Simple</title>
		<link>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2009/08/tis-a-gift-to-be-simple/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2009/08/tis-a-gift-to-be-simple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmlittle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sightwork.org/la/?p=362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The I Ching makes a not so subtle distinction between the &#8220;easy&#8221; and the &#8220;simple&#8221;. By way of example: lets say that there&#8217;s a mountain and for whatever reason we need to get to the top. The &#8220;easy&#8221; solution is to rent a helicopter, or if you&#8217;d prefer we could design and build a funicular [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Ching"> I Ching</a> makes a not so subtle distinction between the &#8220;easy&#8221; and the &#8220;simple&#8221;.  By way of example: lets say that there&#8217;s a mountain and for whatever reason we need to get to the top.  The &#8220;easy&#8221; solution is to rent a helicopter, or if you&#8217;d prefer we could design and build a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funicular">funicular</a> which would allow us to make multiple trips, and perhaps make it possible to sell tickets to future tourists.  Easy solutions, both.  On the other hand, the &#8220;simple&#8221; solution is to start walking/climbing.  What you&#8217;ll notice is that the simple solution doesn&#8217;t require much thought, just a bit of work and a lot of determination.</p>
<p><a href="http://icanhascheezburger.com/2009/08/02/funny-pictures-dude-dude/"><img class="mine_4776861" src="http://icanhascheezburger.wordpress.com/files/2009/07/funny-pictures-cat-scared-you.jpg" alt="funny pictures of cats with captions" /></a><br />
see more <a href="http://icanhascheezburger.com">Lolcats and funny pictures</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve suggested that we need to become community organizers, and given you a tool to help you get started; my assumption being that we need to get our own community going before we can start helping others organize and manage theirs.  I&#8217;m fairly certain that my suggestion has caused a good deal paranoia and paralysis, because you don&#8217;t know how to make a community or how to use the tool.  I&#8217;m equally certain that the real problem is that you&#8217;re looking for an easy solution when what&#8217;s required is simplicity; all you have to do is share something.  It can be a link, a picture, a thought, an idea, a tweet, or a LOLcat.  It really is that simple; share something on a daily basis and community will happen.  It&#8217;s not easy, because it feels new, different, not something you&#8217;re used to doing, but it is simple, sharing is always simple &#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8216;Tis the gift to be loved and that love to return,<br />
Tis the gift to be taught and a richer gift to learn,<br />
And when we expect of others what we try to live each day,<br />
Then we&#8217;ll all live together and we&#8217;ll all learn to say,</p>
<p>When true simplicity is gain&#8217;d,<br />
To bow and to bend we shan&#8217;t be asham&#8217;d,<br />
To turn, turn will be our delight,<br />
Till by turning, turning we come out right.</p>
<p>Pasted from &lt;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Gifts">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Gifts</a>&gt;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2009/08/tis-a-gift-to-be-simple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This may not be a good idea</title>
		<link>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2008/09/this-may-not-be-a-good-idea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2008/09/this-may-not-be-a-good-idea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmlittle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Op Ed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sightwork.org/la/?p=224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[photo credit: Nesster Up to this point I&#8217;ve been assuming that I didn&#8217;t have a student readership, but now that I&#8217;m teaching a class&#8230; Oh well, my real point is that we can&#8217;t turn off the electricity, so I may as well post this.  This Tweet just in form Michael Wesch: &#8220;Chacha &#8230; new ways [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="padding: 0pt 0px 5px 15px; float: right"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/80682954@N00/2165873556/" title="enV" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2192/2165873556_f07b0540a9_m.jpg" alt="enV" border="0" /></a><br /><small><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/" title="Attribution-ShareAlike License" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.sightwork.org/la/wp-content/plugins/photo-dropper/images/cc.png" alt="Creative Commons License" border="0" width="16" height="16" align="absmiddle" /></a> <a href="http://www.photodropper.com/photos/" target="_blank">photo</a> credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/80682954@N00/2165873556/" title="Nesster" target="_blank">Nesster</a></small><br />
</span>Up to this point I&#8217;ve been assuming that I didn&#8217;t have a student readership, but now that I&#8217;m teaching a class&#8230;</p>
<p>Oh well, my real point is that we can&#8217;t turn off the electricity, so I may as well post this.  This Tweet just in form Michael Wesch: &#8220;Chacha &#8230; new ways to cheat on exams / new reasons to write different kinds of exams:  <a href="http://answers.chacha.com/">http://chacha.com/</a>&#8220;.  You got a cellphone or a laptop, you got a question? Thanks to ChaCha you got an answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2008/09/this-may-not-be-a-good-idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breadcrumbs</title>
		<link>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2008/05/breadcrumbs-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2008/05/breadcrumbs-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmlittle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geek Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sightwork.org/la/?p=151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;or this is probably headed somewhere. This particular thread started with a post in IF:book &#8216;looking at libraries&#8216;. Though you should keep in mind that it is thoroughly haunted my last post and Stephen Downes well taken point, &#8220;All authentication fails.&#8221; Actually it may have started with Chris Mesina&#8217;s Thoughts on Data Portability over on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;or this is probably headed somewhere.  This particular thread started with a post in IF:book &#8216;<a href="http://www.futureofthebook.org/blog/archives/2008/05/looking_at_libraries.html">looking at libraries</a>&#8216;. Though you should keep in mind that it is thoroughly haunted my last post and Stephen Downes well taken point, &#8220;All authentication fails.&#8221; Actually it may have started with Chris Mesina&#8217;s <a href="http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2008/05/11/thoughts-on-dataportability/">Thoughts on Data Portability</a> over on  FactoryCity.  Despite the DP handle this turns out to be relatively comprehensible those of us who are code-challenged.   All of this ties together under the headings of &#8216;Who owns what? and Why are libraries architecturally designed to keep people out?  Within the ownership debate there are three main camps: those who think information (and information covers a lot of ground including music, movies, and software), those who believe that they have a vested interest in owning information (same definition), and those don&#8217;t know that there&#8217;s a debate or don&#8217;t understand that it affects them (they also tend to define information as stuff you find in encyclopedias, bus schedules, and TV news).  In all likelihood the debate is already over. WiFi trumps walls and not just the walls around books.    The reality that information is no longer physical.  The value of information has always been its use.  Knowing which horse is going to win only helps if you bet.</p>
<p>Identity increasingly operates like information; for many of us identity is not just physical. Who you are is a function of who you know, what you know and how effectively you can use that knowledge.  You can be Steve Jobs or you can be the Fake Steve Jobs; either will work, you get to choose, but you have to deliver.  At today&#8217;s count there are 203 Shakespeares registered  on MySpace.  It&#8217;s easy stake a claim but writing the next <em>Hamlet</em> or even <em>Troylus and Cressida</em> may prove a little more challenging.  The key phrase is &#8216;the next&#8217; because &#8216;identity&#8217; is different than &#8216;reputation&#8217;.  Reputation like resume is situated in the past, a history of supposed successes and failures. Identity lives in the now, and increasingly in the future, it is a measure of capacity and comletence, of what are doing and can do.</p>
<p>Creating and maintaining an identity  when you become a artist.</p>
<p><a href="http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/article/2994/writing-students-and-professors-fight-to-keep-theses-from-being-freely-available-online">Writing Students and Professors Fight to Keep Theses From Being Freely Available Online</a> from The Chronicle of Higher Education</p>
<p>Brad Wheeler <a href="http://connect.educause.edu/Library/EDUCAUSE+Review/InSearchofCertitude/46604">In Search of Certitude</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2008/05/breadcrumbs-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Screen Real Estate Stupid</title>
		<link>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2008/03/its-screen-real-estate-stupid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2008/03/its-screen-real-estate-stupid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmlittle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geek Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sightwork.org/la/2008/03/19/its-screen-real-estate-stupid/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may have noticed that I&#8217;m a bit obsessed with Seadragon and it&#8217;s various off shoots, but I just stumbled on a more home grown approach to getting more text on the page.&#160; Take a look at Issue Magazine which is just out; it&#8217;ll take some experimenting to get the interface but that&#8217;s part of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have noticed that I&#8217;m a bit obsessed with <a href="http://labs.live.com/Seadragon.aspx">Seadragon</a> and it&#8217;s various off shoots, but I just stumbled on a more home grown approach to getting more text on the page.&#160; Take a look at <a href="http://www.issue-magazine.net/">Issue Magazine</a> which is just out; it&#8217;ll take some experimenting to get the interface but that&#8217;s part of the fun.&#160; The comment function is nice as well, sort of like <a href="http://www.futureofthebook.org/commentpress/">CommentPress</a> but a bit more controlled.&#160; </p>
<p>A little exploring of Issue #0 led me to this <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F02E4DB1330F937A25752C0A9619C8B63">NY Times article</a> which we can file under the &quot;If you thought Second Life was strange try New York City&quot; heading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2008/03/its-screen-real-estate-stupid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-book concept combines leather and multi-touch</title>
		<link>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2008/03/e-book-concept-combines-leather-and-multi-touch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2008/03/e-book-concept-combines-leather-and-multi-touch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 15:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmlittle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sightwork.org/la/2008/03/01/e-book-concept-combines-leather-and-multi-touch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; I&#8217;m not sure that the retro-design trend makes sense, but there are some interesting possibilities in the no button approach.&#160; Click below for a brief description or on the above picture for the original concept. E-book concept combines leather and multi-touch &#8211; Engadget]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;<a href="http://student.designawards.com.au/application_detail.jsp?status=2&amp;applicationID=3503"><img height="440" alt="rsz_1livre.jpg" src="http://www.futureofthebook.org/blog/archives/rsz_1livre.jpg" width="440"/></a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure that the retro-design trend makes sense, but there are some interesting possibilities in the no button approach.&nbsp; Click below for a brief description or on the above picture for the original concept.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/27/e-book-concept-combines-leather-and-multi-touch/">E-book concept combines leather and multi-touch &#8211; Engadget</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2008/03/e-book-concept-combines-leather-and-multi-touch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google World</title>
		<link>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2008/02/google-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2008/02/google-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmlittle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sightwork.org/la/2008/02/28/google-world/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some while back Google acquired Jotspot and generated a fair amount of geek speculation about what was coming. We&#8217;re about to find out because sometime today Google Sites is supposed to go live. Even more exciting, or depending on you taste &#8216;frightening&#8217;, you can try out Google Apps Premium for a 30 day free trial. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some while back Google acquired Jotspot and generated a fair amount of geek speculation about what was coming. We&#8217;re about to find out because sometime today <a href="http://sites.google.com/">Google Sites</a> is supposed to go live.<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/69024677@N00/2290800968/" target="_blank"><img style="margin: 0px 7px 0px 0px" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2311/2290800968_4955031a5b_t.jpg" align="left" border="0"/></a> Even more exciting, or depending on you taste &#8216;frightening&#8217;, you can try out <a href="http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/business/applications.html">Google Apps Premium</a> for a 30 day free trial.</p>
<p><small><a title="creative commons" href="http://www.photodropper.com/creative-commons/" target="_blank"><img height="16" alt="Creative Commons License" src="http://sightwork.org/la/wp-content/plugins/photo_dropper/images/cc.png" width="16" align="absMiddle" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://www.photodropper.com/photos/" target="_blank">photo</a> credit: <a title="OrangeLimey" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/69024677@N00/2290800968/" target="_blank">OrangeLimey</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2008/02/google-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Text Editing Online</title>
		<link>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2008/02/text-editing-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2008/02/text-editing-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmlittle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sightwork.org/la/2008/02/21/text-editing-online/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another multitasking exercise; I often find myself stumbling across tools that I think might be useful one day and it occurs to me that if I file them here I might be able to find them later.&#160; Beyond that they might be useful to you now.&#160; So, here&#8217;s a review of 8 online text editors, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another multitasking exercise; I often find myself stumbling across tools that I think might be useful one day and it occurs to me that if I file them here I might be able to find them later.&nbsp; Beyond that they might be useful to you now.&nbsp; So, here&#8217;s a review of <a href="http://mashable.com/2008/02/20/text-editors-online/">8 online text editors</a>, via mashable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2008/02/text-editing-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Cost of Advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2008/02/the-cost-of-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2008/02/the-cost-of-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmlittle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sightwork.org/la/2008/02/18/the-cost-of-advertising/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Subtitled the price of free&#8230; As I mentioned I&#8217;ve been doing some stuff for a couple of local arts organizations and not surprisingly cost of service is an issue.&#160; In other words it pretty much needs to be free.&#160; This isn&#8217;t a problem in and of itself; there are more free services than I can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Subtitled the price of free&#8230;</p>
<p>As I mentioned I&#8217;ve been doing some stuff for a couple of local arts organizations and not surprisingly cost of service is an issue.&nbsp; In other words it pretty much needs to be free.&nbsp; This isn&#8217;t a problem in and of itself; there are more free services than I can keep up with, but there are some issues.&nbsp; Free often means that you&#8217;re paying with screen real estate; for a quarter of the screen they&#8217;ll let you post content on something that looks like your site.&nbsp; That seems fair but there are individuals who object to shilling for the corporate blogosphere, so I&#8217;ve been trying to stay with ad free; that&#8217;s not really a problem but there&#8217;s another issue that is, you might say &#8216;technical&#8217;.&nbsp; Power comes at the price of knowledge. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t suppose that it&#8217;s exactly news that simple things don&#8217;t do as much as complex things, or that the more you want to do and the better you want to it the more you&#8217;re going to have to practice.&nbsp; In tech terms if you want a simple blog Google gives you <a href="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</a> and you can pretty much figure it out without any prior experience.&nbsp; It&#8217;s a fantastic interface and you can look like a professional blogger in a matter of minutes.&nbsp; What you can&#8217;t do is turn it into a content management system or a Wiki.&nbsp; You can use <a href="http://wordpress.com/">WordPress.com</a>, which is also free, and comes close to something like a simple CMS, but the interface requires more effort and knowledge.&nbsp; If you want a Wiki <a href="http://www.wetpaint.com/">WetPaint</a> is about about equivalent to Blogger in terms of ease and obviousness. If you need more power try <a href="http://www.wikidot.com/">Wikidot</a>, but again a less friendly UI and a steeper figuring-out curve.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s tempting to make parallels with information, and suggest that you get what you &#8216;pay&#8217; for; pay in this instance equaling effort. TV news isn&#8217;t as in depth as newspaper news, but then again it&#8217;s much more immediate. The real point however, is that things are getting easier.&nbsp; Things you couldn&#8217;t do a year or two ago are now possible with just a bit of effort, and a year from now pretty much anyone* will be able to do them.</p>
<p>*Standard Caveat: Anyone with, electricity, computer access, a cell phone, etc. and we should remember that more and more people fall into this category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2008/02/the-cost-of-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>That&#8217;s Why</title>
		<link>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2008/02/thats-why/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2008/02/thats-why/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmlittle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sightwork.org/la/2008/02/12/thats-why/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the past while I&#8217;ve been wondering why I spend $100 a year for web hosting.&#160; I could get all the services, blog, email, etc. for free, and I don&#8217;t think that Google or Microsoft is going out of business anytime soon. Yahoo I&#8217;m not so sure about, but still.&#160; Here&#8217;s a horror story by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the past while I&#8217;ve been wondering why I spend $100 a year for web hosting.&nbsp; I could get all the services, blog, email, etc. for free, and I don&#8217;t think that Google or Microsoft is going out of business anytime soon. Yahoo I&#8217;m not so sure about, but still.&nbsp; Here&#8217;s a <a href="http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2008/02/04/just_because_we.html">horror story</a> by way of DB that makes me feel better about it. First, if I pay someone to host my content and something screws up, I don&#8217;t figure that I&#8217;m going to need to be &#8216;connected&#8217; in order to get my data restored; second, somehow paying makes me feel more responsible for backing up my data locally. That&#8217;s not exactly rational, or maybe it is: caveat emptor.&nbsp; Being a buyer reminds me that I have both rights &amp; responsibilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sightwork.org/la/2008/02/thats-why/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

